The line in this particular published novel that did get my ire up is shortened as follows: "Any experience terrifying enough to cause a panic attack, in extreme circumstances, causes an arrhythmia. That's a heart attack."
Really? No. There's a lot medically wrong with this sentence.

When this happens, the medical team begins to see aberrant beats. But see, the heart attack itself generally causes the arrhythmia, not the other way around.
Let's stay on track with this character. A healthy, college age woman. The incidence of actual heart disease is going to be low. What causes chest pain during a panic attack? Generally, the heart rate may be faster than usual. However, the truly rapid heart beat of SVT (more on that later) I would say is rare and would point away from the mind and more to the conduction system in the heart.
The last thing to consider is that people who have true heart arrhythmias, may have structurally fine hearts. Meaning the muscle, valves, and coronary arteries are good. Just the conduction system is a little funky.
My advice for authors-- don't make blanket medical statements. Just like they taught you in school-- sentences that have all, every, etc... are likely the wrong answer.
0 comments:
Post a Comment